Practice Areas Archives - Page 3 of 4 - Sewrattan Criminal Lawyers Professional Corporation

Mischief Charges in Toronto and Ontario

Composed by Chris Sewrattan, Certified Specialist in Criminal Law. Updated July 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. It does not create a lawyer-client relationship. For advice about your situation, contact us for a consultation.

Mischief is the Criminal Code's property damage offence. Section 430 makes it a crime to wilfully destroy or damage property, render it dangerous, useless, inoperative, or ineffective, or obstruct someone's lawful use or enjoyment of it. The charge shows up everywhere from broken phones during arguments to keyed cars, broken windows, and graffiti. Two things surprise people about it: you can be charged over property you partly own, and the word wilfully includes recklessness, not just deliberate destruction.

What is mischief under Canadian law?

The Crown must prove beyond a reasonable doubt:

One of the prohibited acts: destroying or damaging property; rendering it dangerous, useless, inoperative, or ineffective; or obstructing, interrupting, or interfering with the lawful use, enjoyment, or operation of property.
That the act was done wilfully: under section 429 of the Criminal Code, that means intentionally or recklessly, knowing the damage was likely and proceeding anyway. A true accident is not mischief.
Without legal justification, excuse, or colour of right: an honest belief in a legal right to deal with the property as you did is a defence.

Ownership is narrower than people assume. Because the offence protects other people's interests in property, a person can be charged with mischief for damaging jointly owned property, which is why the charge appears so often alongside domestic assault allegations: a phone or door damaged during a household argument belongs, at least in part, to someone else. The Criminal Code also contains separate mischief provisions for computer data and for property such as religious buildings and war memorials.

Penalties for mischief in Ontario

The penalties scale with value and danger. Mischief involving property worth more than $5,000 is a hybrid offence with a maximum of 10 years in prison by indictment; mischief involving $5,000 or less is hybrid with a maximum of 2 years by indictment or 2 years less a day on summary conviction. Where the mischief causes actual danger to life, the maximum is life imprisonment. There are no mandatory minimums.

Real-world outcomes for first-time, low-value allegations in Ontario are usually at the modest end: diversion, peace bonds, discharges, and probation, often with restitution as the centrepiece. Paying for the damage does not automatically end a prosecution, but it is frequently the practical key to a resolution that avoids a criminal record. Higher-value damage, repeated conduct, and hate-motivated mischief are treated much more seriously. Two 2026 changes bear noting: from July 15, 2026, interfering with essential infrastructure, copper theft being Parliament's example, is a statutory aggravating factor, and from July 18, 2026 the Combatting Hate Act adds new offences for intimidating or obstructing access to places of worship, schools, and community centres and strengthens how the Criminal Code addresses hate-motivated crime.

Possible defences to a mischief charge

Depending on the evidence, defences may include:

Colour of right: an honest belief in a legal right to deal with the property, common in disputes over shared belongings, tenancies, and property lines.
Accident: damage caused without intent or recklessness is not wilful and is not the offence.
Ownership and consent: sole ownership of the property, or the consent of the other interest-holder.
Identity: graffiti and vandalism prosecutions often turn on disputed identification, video quality, and attribution of tags.
Valuation: the over and under $5,000 line changes the charge, and repair estimates can be contested.
Charter issues, including statements taken without proper rights to counsel and unreasonable delay under section 11(b).

Frequently asked questions

Can I be charged with mischief for damaging my own property?

If the property is solely yours, generally no. But if it is jointly owned, for example with a spouse, or someone else has an interest in it, damaging it can be mischief. This is one of the most common ways the charge arises in domestic cases.

Is accidental damage mischief?

No. The Crown must prove the damage was caused intentionally or recklessly. A genuine accident is a defence, though recklessness, foreseeing the likely damage and proceeding anyway, is enough for the Crown.

If I pay for the damage, will the charge be dropped?

Not automatically, but restitution is often the practical path to diversion, a peace bond, or a withdrawal. The Crown, not the property owner, decides whether the prosecution continues.

What are the penalties for mischief?

Up to 2 years by indictment for property worth $5,000 or less, up to 10 years for property over $5,000, and up to life where the mischief endangers life. First-time, low-value matters usually resolve far below the maximums.

Is graffiti a criminal offence?

Yes, graffiti is prosecuted as mischief. Cases typically turn on identification and attribution, and municipal by-law or diversion resolutions are sometimes available for minor incidents.

What is mischief endangering life?

A separate, far more serious form of the offence where the wilful damage causes actual danger to life, such as tampering with equipment or infrastructure. It is punishable by up to life imprisonment.

Charged with mischief? Contact us

This is legal information, not legal advice. It does not create a lawyer-client relationship. For advice about your situation, contact us for a consultation.

Sewrattan Criminal Lawyers defends mischief and property charges across Toronto and Ontario. Contact us for a consultation: 416-583-1510 ext. 2. Related pages: Domestic Assault and Theft.

Practice Areas - 12/05/2015

Aggravated Assault Charges in Toronto and Ontario

Composed by Chris Sewrattan, Certified Specialist in Criminal Law. Updated July 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. It does not create a lawyer-client relationship. For advice about your situation, contact us for a consultation.

Aggravated assault is the most serious assault charge short of homicide. Under section 268 of the Criminal Code, an assault becomes aggravated when it wounds, maims, disfigures, or endangers the life of the complainant. These cases usually involve significant injuries, hospital records, and high stakes: the offence is straight indictable with a 14-year maximum, and a conviction carries a mandatory weapons prohibition. The defence work concentrates on self-defence, on what the accused could reasonably foresee, and on whether the injuries actually meet the aggravating definitions.

What is aggravated assault under Canadian law?

The Crown must prove beyond a reasonable doubt:

An assault: the intentional application of force without consent.
An aggravating consequence: the assault wounded (broke the skin), maimed (deprived the person of the use of a body part), disfigured (caused lasting injury to appearance), or endangered the complainant's life. Life endangerment does not require the complainant to have nearly died; it requires that the assault put their life at risk.
The fault element: the accused intentionally applied force, and a reasonable person would have foreseen that the assault exposed the complainant to a risk of bodily harm. The Crown does not have to prove the accused intended the wounding or the endangerment itself, only that bodily harm was objectively foreseeable.

Because the offence turns on consequences, charges often start as assault causing bodily harm and are upgraded when medical records arrive, or are laid as aggravated assault and later resolve to a lesser included offence such as assault when the injuries are put in context.

Penalties for aggravated assault in Ontario

Aggravated assault is a straight indictable offence with a maximum penalty of 14 years in prison. There is no mandatory minimum, and the sentencing range is wide: a genuinely defensive overreaction by a first offender is treated very differently from a group beating or a knife attack. That said, custody is the usual outcome where the Crown proves a true aggravated assault, and penitentiary sentences are common for serious wounding.

A conviction brings a mandatory weapons prohibition under section 109 of the Criminal Code and a DNA order, since aggravated assault is a primary designated offence. Immigration consequences for non-citizens are severe at this level of allegation. Bail is contested hard in these cases; our bail hearings page explains how release plans are built for serious violence allegations.

Possible defences to an aggravated assault charge

Depending on the evidence, defences may include:

Self-defence: section 34 permits reasonable defensive force. In aggravated assault cases the fight is usually over proportionality, and the law does not require a person under attack to measure their response with precision.
Foreseeability: whether a reasonable person in the accused's position would have foreseen a risk of bodily harm from the act, particularly in single-punch cases with catastrophic but unforeseeable consequences.
The aggravating element: whether the injuries legally amount to wounding, maiming, disfigurement, or endangerment of life, which is contested through medical evidence.
Causation: whether the assault, as opposed to a fall, an intervening event, or a pre-existing condition, caused the aggravated injury.
Identity: group altercations, video interpretation, and unreliable eyewitness identification.
Charter issues and delay, including statements taken in breach of the right to counsel and unreasonable delay under section 11(b).

Frequently asked questions

What makes an assault aggravated?

The consequences. An assault is aggravated when it wounds, maims, disfigures, or endangers life. Without one of those results, the charge is simple assault or assault causing bodily harm.

What is a wound in law?

Generally an injury that breaks the skin. Cuts requiring stitches and stab wounds are classic examples, and courts assess the medical evidence rather than labels in a police synopsis.

Did I have to intend the serious injury?

No. The Crown must prove you intended the assault and that bodily harm was objectively foreseeable. It does not have to prove you intended the wounding or endangerment that resulted.

What is the maximum sentence for aggravated assault?

Fourteen years in prison. There is no mandatory minimum, and actual sentences depend heavily on the circumstances, the injuries, and the offender's background.

Can self-defence apply if the other person was badly hurt?

Yes. Serious injury does not disqualify self-defence; the question is whether the force used was reasonable in the circumstances as the accused perceived them. Proportionality is assessed realistically, not with hindsight precision.

Can aggravated assault be reduced to a lesser charge?

In appropriate cases, yes. Assault and assault causing bodily harm are included offences, and cases resolve to them where the aggravating element or the foreseeability of harm cannot be proven.

Charged with aggravated assault? Contact us

This is legal information, not legal advice. It does not create a lawyer-client relationship. For advice about your situation, contact us for a consultation.

Sewrattan Criminal Lawyers defends aggravated assault and other serious violence charges across Toronto and Ontario. Contact us for a consultation: 416-583-1510 ext. 2. Related pages: Assault Causing Bodily Harm, Assault, and Bail Hearings.

Practice Areas - 12/05/2015

Assault Causing Bodily Harm Charges in Toronto and Ontario

Composed by Chris Sewrattan, Certified Specialist in Criminal Law. Updated July 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. It does not create a lawyer-client relationship. For advice about your situation, contact us for a consultation.

Assault causing bodily harm is an offence under section 267(b) of the Criminal Code. It is an ordinary assault made more serious by its result: an injury that goes beyond the fleeting and the trivial. Because the charge sits between simple assault and aggravated assault, cases are fought on two fronts: whether the assault itself can be proven, including whether it was self-defence or a consensual fight, and whether the injury meets the legal definition of bodily harm.

What is assault causing bodily harm under Canadian law?

The Crown must prove beyond a reasonable doubt:

An assault: the intentional application of force to another person without their consent, or an attempt or threat by act or gesture to apply force with the present ability to do so.
Bodily harm: section 2 of the Criminal Code defines it as any hurt or injury that interferes with the complainant's health or comfort and is more than merely transient or trifling. Bruising, swelling, cuts requiring treatment, and lasting pain can qualify; a fleeting mark or momentary discomfort generally does not.
Causation: the assault caused the injury, as opposed to a pre-existing condition or a separate event.

Consent has limits in this territory. In R v Jobidon, the Supreme Court held that consent to a fist fight is vitiated where serious bodily harm is both intended and caused, which is why mutual fights still produce convictions. The mental element attaches to the assault itself; the Crown does not have to prove the accused intended the particular injury.

Penalties for assault causing bodily harm in Ontario

Assault causing bodily harm is a hybrid offence. The maximum penalty is 10 years in prison if the Crown proceeds by indictment, or 2 years less a day on summary conviction. There is no mandatory minimum. Outcomes in Ontario range from discharges and probation for isolated incidents with modest injuries through to jail where the violence was sustained, gratuitous, or aggravated by a record.

Ancillary consequences matter as much as the sentence. Where the Crown proceeds by indictment, a conviction triggers a mandatory weapons prohibition under section 109 of the Criminal Code; on summary conviction, a discretionary prohibition is available under section 110. A DNA order can be made, and for non-citizens a conviction can have serious immigration consequences. Where the allegation involves an intimate partner, the stricter bail and sentencing framework described on our domestic assault page applies as well.

Possible defences to an assault causing bodily harm charge

Depending on the evidence, defences may include:

Self-defence: section 34 of the Criminal Code permits reasonable force to defend yourself or another person, assessed on factors including the nature of the threat, proportionality, and the history between the parties.
Consent: in genuinely consensual altercations, the Jobidon limits are the battleground; where serious bodily harm was neither intended nor caused, consent can remain a defence.
The injury threshold: medical records and photographs often show injuries that are transient or trifling in law, reducing the case to simple assault at most.
Causation: pre-existing injuries, intervening events, and injuries inconsistent with the alleged mechanism.
Identity and reliability: chaotic multi-person incidents, poor lighting, and cross-racial identification frailties.
Charter issues and delay, including statements taken in breach of the right to counsel and unreasonable delay under section 11(b).

Frequently asked questions

What counts as bodily harm?

Any hurt or injury that interferes with health or comfort and is more than merely transient or trifling. Significant bruising, cuts, sprains, and injuries needing medical attention typically qualify; fleeting redness or momentary pain typically does not.

What is the difference between assault, assault causing bodily harm, and aggravated assault?

The difference is the injury. Simple assault requires no injury, assault causing bodily harm requires harm beyond the trivial, and aggravated assault requires wounding, maiming, disfigurement, or endangerment of life.

Can I be convicted after a fight we both agreed to?

Possibly. Consent to a fist fight is no defence where serious bodily harm was both intended and caused. Where the harm was neither intended nor serious, consent remains a live defence.

Will I go to jail for assault causing bodily harm?

Not necessarily. First-time allegations with modest injuries often resolve with discharges, probation, or peace bonds, while serious or repeated violence attracts jail. Outcomes depend on the evidence and circumstances of each case.

Does a conviction come with a weapons ban?

If the Crown proceeded by indictment, a weapons prohibition is mandatory on conviction. On summary conviction the court has discretion to impose one.

What if the complainant does not want to press charges?

In Canada the Crown, not the complainant, decides whether a prosecution proceeds. The complainant's wishes are a factor the Crown considers, but charges do not end simply because the complainant asks.

Charged with assault causing bodily harm? Contact us

This is legal information, not legal advice. It does not create a lawyer-client relationship. For advice about your situation, contact us for a consultation.

Sewrattan Criminal Lawyers defends assault charges at every level of seriousness across Toronto and Ontario. Contact us for a consultation: 416-583-1510 ext. 2. Related pages: Assault and Aggravated Assault.

Practice Areas - 12/05/2015

Criminal Harassment Charges in Toronto and Ontario

Composed by Chris Sewrattan, Certified Specialist in Criminal Law. Updated July 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. It does not create a lawyer-client relationship. For advice about your situation, contact us for a consultation.

Criminal harassment, often called stalking, is an offence under section 264 of the Criminal Code. It criminalizes four kinds of conduct that cause another person to reasonably fear for their safety: repeatedly following, repeatedly communicating, watching or besetting places the person is, and threatening conduct. Most Toronto charges arise from the end of a relationship, and the evidence is usually a stack of messages. What the messages actually show, and whether the complainant's fear was reasonable, are where these cases are decided.

What is criminal harassment under Canadian law?

The Crown must prove each of the following beyond a reasonable doubt:

Prohibited conduct: (a) repeatedly following the person or someone known to them; (b) repeatedly communicating, directly or indirectly, with the person or someone known to them; (c) besetting or watching a place where the person lives, works, or happens to be; or (d) engaging in threatening conduct directed at the person or their family. The "repeatedly" branches require more than one incident; the watching and threatening conduct branches can be made out by a single serious incident.
Harassment: the conduct actually harassed the complainant, in the sense of tormenting, troubling, or plaguing them, and the accused knew this or was reckless or wilfully blind to it.
Fear: the conduct caused the complainant to fear for their safety or the safety of someone known to them, including psychological safety, and that fear was reasonable in all the circumstances. From July 18, 2026, this element is assessed objectively: the question becomes whether a reasonable person in the complainant's circumstances would fear for their safety, and the offence expressly captures harassment carried out through electronic monitoring.

The offence does not require threats or violence; persistent unwanted contact can be enough. Harassment charges are frequently laid alongside uttering threats or domestic assault counts, and increasingly alongside intimate image allegations after a breakup.

Penalties for criminal harassment in Ontario

Criminal harassment is a hybrid offence with a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison if the Crown proceeds by indictment, or 2 years less a day on summary conviction. There is no mandatory minimum. Sentencing turns on the persistence and intrusiveness of the conduct, any breaches of court orders, and the accused's record; outcomes range from peace bonds and discharges for brief, non-threatening conduct to significant jail for prolonged stalking. Bail conditions are strict from the outset, typically prohibiting all contact and attendance near the complainant's home and work, and a conviction can bring weapons prohibitions and immigration consequences for non-citizens.

Possible defences to a criminal harassment charge

Depending on the evidence, defences may include:

The conduct was not harassment: communications that were legitimate, invited, or two-sided, such as messages about shared children, property, or unresolved business, viewed in their full context.
No repetition where repetition is required: single or sparse contacts charged under the "repeatedly" branches.
No knowledge or recklessness: the accused neither knew nor was wilfully blind to the complainant feeling harassed, particularly where no one ever said to stop.
The fear was absent or not reasonable: assessed objectively on the whole record, not on the police summary.
Lawful authority or legitimate purpose: conduct such as serving legal documents or attending shared spaces for genuine reasons.
Identity and authorship in anonymous account cases, and Charter issues including device searches and unreasonable delay under section 11(b) and the Jordan framework.

Frequently asked questions

How many messages count as criminal harassment?

There is no fixed number. "Repeatedly" means more than once, and courts have convicted on a small number of contacts where the context made them frightening, and acquitted on many contacts where the exchange was mutual. Context decides.

Is it criminal harassment if I never threatened anyone?

It can be. Threats are not an element of the offence; persistent unwanted following, communicating, or watching that causes reasonable fear for safety is enough, and safety includes psychological safety.

What if my ex kept responding to my messages?

A genuinely two-sided exchange undercuts the elements of harassment and reasonable fear, which is why the complete message history matters. Selective excerpts can make an ordinary dispute look one-sided.

Can I be charged for contacting someone about our children?

Communication for a legitimate purpose is relevant to whether the conduct was harassing, but repeated contact that goes beyond the legitimate purpose can still ground a charge. Family court orders and bail conditions also control what contact is permitted.

Will I go to jail for criminal harassment?

Outcomes in Ontario range widely. Brief, non-threatening conduct by a first-time accused often resolves with a peace bond, discharge, or probation, while prolonged or escalating stalking attracts jail. Outcomes depend on the evidence in each case.

What should I do if I am accused of harassment?

Stop all contact with the complainant immediately, follow any release conditions exactly, and preserve the complete communication history. Breaching a no-contact condition is a separate criminal charge that badly damages the original case.

Charged with criminal harassment? Contact us

This is legal information, not legal advice. It does not create a lawyer-client relationship. For advice about your situation, contact us for a consultation.

Sewrattan Criminal Lawyers defends criminal harassment charges across Toronto and Ontario. Contact us for a consultation: 416-583-1510 ext. 2. Related pages: Utter Threats, Domestic Assault, and Distributing an Intimate Image.

Practice Areas - 12/05/2015

Utter Threats Charges in Toronto and Ontario

Composed by Chris Sewrattan, Certified Specialist in Criminal Law. Updated July 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. It does not create a lawyer-client relationship. For advice about your situation, contact us for a consultation.

Uttering threats is a criminal offence under section 264.1 of the Criminal Code. It covers threats to cause death or bodily harm to any person, threats to burn or destroy property, and threats to kill or injure an animal. Because the offence is complete the moment the words are spoken or written, people are regularly charged over a single text message, voicemail, or heated remark, and the case then turns on two questions: what the words objectively meant in their context, and what the speaker intended by them.

What is uttering threats under Canadian law?

To convict, the Crown must prove two elements beyond a reasonable doubt, as the Supreme Court explained in R v McRae:

The words, viewed objectively in their full context, conveyed a threat of death or bodily harm (or to property or an animal). The question is how a reasonable person would understand the words, taking into account the circumstances, the relationship between the people involved, and how the words were communicated.
The speaker intended the words to intimidate or to be taken seriously. It does not matter whether the recipient actually felt afraid, whether the speaker intended to carry the threat out, or even whether the threat ever reached the person it was about. A threat spoken to a third party can still be an offence.

Words said in obvious jest, hyperbole, or as an exclamation of frustration are not threats in law, but the line is drawn by context, not by the speaker's later explanation. Threat charges frequently accompany domestic assault and criminal harassment allegations, and they carry the same strict bail conditions in Ontario, including no-contact terms.

Penalties for uttering threats in Ontario

Uttering threats is a hybrid offence. For threats to cause death or bodily harm, the maximum penalty is 5 years in prison if the Crown proceeds by indictment, or 2 years less a day on summary conviction. For threats against property or animals, the maximum by indictment is 2 years. There is no mandatory minimum. In practice, Ontario outcomes for first-time allegations range from withdrawal of the charge, sometimes with a peace bond or counselling, through discharges and probation; jail is reserved for threats with aggravating features such as weapons, repetition, or a related record. A conviction can also bring weapons prohibitions and, for non-citizens, immigration consequences.

Possible defences to an uttering threats charge

Depending on the evidence, defences may include:

The words were not a threat: read in context, they were hyperbole, venting, a bad joke, or ambiguous words that a reasonable person would not take as a threat of death or bodily harm.
No intent to intimidate or be taken seriously: the mental element is where frustration cases are fought, particularly where the words were blurted in a heated moment.
Disputed words: what was actually said, especially in oral exchanges with no recording, and the reliability of the person reporting them.
Identity: in online and anonymous message cases, proof of who actually authored and sent the words.
Context evidence: prior communications and the full message thread often change the meaning of an isolated line the police synopsis quotes.
Charter issues and delay, including statements taken in breach of the right to counsel and unreasonable delay under section 11(b) and the Jordan framework.

Frequently asked questions

Can I be charged for a threat I did not mean?

You can be charged, but the Crown must prove you intended the words to intimidate or to be taken seriously. Words that were clearly a joke or empty venting, judged in context, do not meet the legal test.

Is it a threat if I never said it to the person directly?

It can be. The offence does not require the threat to be conveyed to its target; a threat spoken or written to a third party about someone else can still be uttering threats.

Can a text message or social media post be a criminal threat?

Yes. Threats can be uttered in any form, including texts, direct messages, emails, and posts. The full thread and surrounding context matter, which is why preserving the complete conversation is important for the defence.

Does the person have to be afraid for it to be a threat?

No. The recipient's actual fear is not an element of the offence. The test is how a reasonable person would understand the words in context, together with the speaker's intent.

Will I go to jail for uttering threats?

Usually not for a first allegation without aggravating features. Many threats charges in Ontario resolve without a conviction, through withdrawal, a peace bond, or a discharge. Outcomes depend on the evidence and circumstances of each case.

What is a conditional threat?

A threat framed as a condition, such as words to the effect of "if you do that again, I will hurt you," can still be a criminal threat. Framing words conditionally does not take them outside the offence if they otherwise meet the test.

Charged with uttering threats? Contact us

This is legal information, not legal advice. It does not create a lawyer-client relationship. For advice about your situation, contact us for a consultation.

Sewrattan Criminal Lawyers defends uttering threats charges across Toronto and Ontario. Contact us for a consultation: 416-583-1510 ext. 2. Related pages: Criminal Harassment and Domestic Assault.

Practice Areas - 12/05/2015

Domestic Assault Charges in Toronto and Ontario

Composed by Chris Sewrattan, Certified Specialist in Criminal Law. Updated July 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. It does not create a lawyer-client relationship. For advice about your situation, contact us for a consultation.

Domestic assault is an assault charge under section 266 of the Criminal Code where the complainant is a spouse, partner, or ex-partner. There is no separate "domestic assault" offence, but Ontario treats these cases differently at every stage: police lay charges as a matter of policy, the accused is usually placed on strict no-contact conditions immediately, and the complainant cannot withdraw the charge. Most people charged in Toronto are surprised by how quickly the case takes on a life of its own, and by how much the conditions, not the possible sentence, disrupt daily life.

What is domestic assault under Canadian law?

Section 265 of the Criminal Code defines assault as the intentional application of force to another person without their consent, and it extends to attempts and threats by act or gesture to apply force. Any assault committed against an intimate partner is prosecuted as a domestic matter. The intimate partner context is not an element of the offence; it is an aggravating factor at sentencing under section 718.2(a)(ii), and it changes bail: for a person previously found guilty of intimate partner violence, including by way of a discharge, the Criminal Code reverses the onus at the bail hearing. From July 15, 2026, the onus also reverses for assaults and sexual assaults involving choking, suffocation or strangulation, allegations that arise disproportionately in intimate partner cases, and Parliament has enacted a new coercive control offence that will come into force within two years.

The Crown must still prove the assault itself beyond a reasonable doubt: an intentional, non-consensual application of force by the accused. Many domestic cases turn entirely on the credibility and reliability of the people involved, often with no independent witnesses.

How domestic assault cases proceed in Ontario

Ontario police services operate under charging policies for intimate partner violence: where officers have grounds, they lay the charge regardless of what the complainant wants. After the charge, the accused is typically released on conditions that prohibit contact with the complainant and bar attendance at the family home, even where the complainant wants contact. Changing those conditions requires a formal process, usually with the complainant's input taken through the Crown.

A complainant cannot "drop the charges." The decision to continue belongs to the Crown alone. In Toronto, domestic matters proceed in specialized court streams, and depending on the seriousness of the allegation and the accused's record, resolutions can include counselling-based programs such as the Partner Assault Response program, a peace bond under section 810 of the Criminal Code with the charge withdrawn, or a trial.

Penalties for domestic assault in Ontario

Assault under section 266 is a hybrid offence: the maximum penalty is 5 years in prison if the Crown proceeds by indictment, or 2 years less a day on summary conviction. Sentences range widely, from an absolute or conditional discharge through probation to jail, depending on the allegations, injuries, the accused's record, and the circumstances. The intimate partner context is an aggravating factor. A conviction also brings collateral consequences that matter as much as the sentence: a criminal record, potential immigration consequences for non-citizens, family law implications, and firearms prohibitions in many cases.

Possible defences to a domestic assault charge

Depending on the evidence, defences may include:

Self-defence under section 34 of the Criminal Code, where the force used was a reasonable response to force or threatened force.
No intentional application of force: accidental contact, reflexive movement, or physical contact that was incidental rather than an assault.
Consent, in the limited circumstances where the law recognizes it.
Credibility and reliability: inconsistencies between statements, text messages and other records that contradict the allegation, and the surrounding context, which in some cases includes a separation or parenting dispute. Courts assess these issues carefully on the evidence.
Charter issues and delay, including unreasonable delay under section 11(b) and the Jordan framework.

Frequently asked questions

Can my partner drop the domestic assault charges?

No. In Ontario, once police lay a charge, only the Crown can withdraw it, and Crown policy treats intimate partner cases seriously. A complainant's wishes are one factor the Crown considers, but they do not control the outcome.

Can I go home or contact my partner while the case is ongoing?

Usually not at first. Standard conditions prohibit contact and attendance at the shared home. Conditions can sometimes be varied to allow contact or a return home, through a formal variation process that generally involves the complainant's input through the Crown.

Will I get a criminal record for a first domestic assault charge?

Not necessarily. Outcomes in Ontario range from withdrawal of the charge, sometimes with a peace bond or after counselling, to a discharge, to a conviction. The result depends on the strength of the evidence, the allegations, and the accused's circumstances.

What is a peace bond?

A peace bond under section 810 of the Criminal Code is a court order to keep the peace and follow conditions for up to 12 months. It is not a conviction and does not create a criminal record, and in appropriate domestic cases the Crown withdraws the charge when one is entered.

Will a domestic assault charge affect my immigration status?

It can. A conviction for assault can have serious consequences for permanent residents and other non-citizens under immigration law. Anyone without citizenship should raise their status early, because it affects how the case should be resolved.

Will I go to jail for domestic assault?

Jail is available but is not the outcome in most first-time cases involving minor or no injuries. Sentences depend on the specific facts, and many first allegations resolve without a conviction at all. Outcomes depend on the evidence in each case.

Charged with domestic assault? Contact us

This is legal information, not legal advice. It does not create a lawyer-client relationship. For advice about your situation, contact us for a consultation.

Sewrattan Criminal Lawyers defends domestic assault and intimate partner charges across Toronto and Ontario. Contact us for a consultation: 416-583-1510 ext. 2. Related pages: Assault, Utter Threats, and Bail Hearings.

Practice Areas - 12/04/2015

Assault Charges in Toronto and Ontario

Composed by Chris Sewrattan, Certified Specialist in Criminal Law. Updated July 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. It does not create a lawyer-client relationship. For advice about your situation, contact us for a consultation.

Assault is one of the most commonly charged offences in Toronto and across Ontario. Under section 265 of the Criminal Code, an assault is the intentional application of force to another person without consent, and the charge can arise from anything from a shove to a punch, no injury required. A first offence rarely results in jail, but a conviction creates a criminal record with lasting employment, travel, and immigration consequences, which is why the defences and the available resolutions matter.

What is assault under Canadian law?

Section 265 of the Criminal Code sets out three ways an assault can be committed:

Intentionally applying force to another person, directly or indirectly, without their consent. The force can be minor; no injury or pain is required.
Attempting or threatening, by an act or gesture, to apply force, where the other person reasonably believes it will happen. Words alone are not an assault, but words plus a raised fist can be.
Accosting or impeding a person while openly carrying a weapon or an imitation of one.

The basic offence is charged under section 266. To convict, the Crown must prove identity, an intentional application (or threat) of force, and the absence of consent, all beyond a reasonable doubt. Where injuries result, the charge escalates: assault causing bodily harm where the harm is more than trifling, and aggravated assault where the complainant is wounded, maimed, disfigured, or their life is endangered. Where the complainant is an intimate partner, the case proceeds as a domestic assault.

Penalties for assault in Ontario

Assault under section 266 is a hybrid offence. If the Crown proceeds by indictment, the maximum penalty is 5 years in prison; on summary conviction, the maximum is 2 years less a day. In practice, sentences in Ontario span the full range: withdrawal of the charge (sometimes with a peace bond or after community-based programming), an absolute or conditional discharge, probation, and jail in more serious cases or for people with related records. A conviction can also bring weapons prohibitions, DNA orders in some circumstances, and immigration consequences for non-citizens. From July 15, 2026, an assault against a first responder or a public transit worker is also a statutory aggravating factor at sentencing. For a first-time accused with a minor allegation, the realistic fight is often about avoiding a criminal record altogether.

Possible defences to an assault charge

Depending on the evidence, defences may include:

Self-defence: section 34 of the Criminal Code permits reasonable force in response to force or threatened force. Courts look at the whole picture, including the nature of the threat, proportionality, and whether there were other options.
Defence of another person or of property, under sections 34 and 35.
Consent: a consensual fight can be a defence, but the Supreme Court has held that consent is vitiated where serious bodily harm is both intended and caused, so the scope of this defence depends on the facts.
No intentional force: accidental or reflexive contact, or contact that is part of the ordinary jostling of daily life, is not an assault.
Identity and reliability: mistaken identification in chaotic incidents, poor lighting or video quality, and inconsistencies between witness accounts.
Charter issues and delay, including unreasonable delay under section 11(b) and the Jordan framework.

Frequently asked questions

Will I go to jail for a first assault charge?

Usually not for a minor, first-time allegation in Ontario. Common outcomes include withdrawal, a peace bond, a discharge, or probation. Jail becomes realistic where there are injuries, weapons, a related record, or other aggravating features. Outcomes depend on the evidence in each case.

Will an assault conviction give me a criminal record?

A conviction does. However, many first-time assault charges in Ontario resolve without a conviction, through withdrawal, a peace bond, or a discharge. Whether those options are realistic depends on the allegation and the Crown's position.

Is it still assault if it was a mutual fight?

Not necessarily. Consent can be a defence to a consensual fight, but the defence has limits: consent does not apply where serious bodily harm was both intended and caused. Who started it, what was agreed to, and what force was actually used all matter.

How does self-defence work in Canada?

Section 34 of the Criminal Code allows a person to use reasonable force to protect themselves or someone else from force or the threat of it. The response must be reasonable in the circumstances, which courts assess using factors such as the nature of the threat, proportionality, and the history between the people involved.

Can the complainant drop an assault charge?

No. In Ontario, the Crown alone decides whether a charge proceeds. A complainant's wishes are considered but are not decisive, particularly in domestic cases.

Do I need a lawyer for an assault charge?

An assault file involves disclosure review, potential Charter and credibility issues, and negotiation over resolutions that avoid a record. A criminal defence lawyer can assess the realistic outcomes early and protect against avoidable consequences.

Charged with assault? Contact us

This is legal information, not legal advice. It does not create a lawyer-client relationship. For advice about your situation, contact us for a consultation.

Sewrattan Criminal Lawyers defends assault charges of every kind across Toronto and Ontario. Contact us for a consultation: 416-583-1510 ext. 2. Related pages: Domestic Assault, Assault Causing Bodily Harm, and Aggravated Assault.

Practice Areas - 12/04/2015

Possessing Stolen Property Charges in Toronto and Ontario

Composed by Chris Sewrattan, Certified Specialist in Criminal Law. Updated July 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. It does not create a lawyer-client relationship. For advice about your situation, contact us for a consultation.

Possession of property obtained by crime is an offence under section 354 of the Criminal Code, with penalties set by section 355. The charge captures people found with stolen goods, whether or not they had anything to do with the original theft. The single most important word in the section is knowledge: the Crown must prove the accused knew the property was obtained by crime, and cases rise and fall on how that knowledge is, or is not, proven.

What is possession of stolen property under Canadian law?

The Crown must prove beyond a reasonable doubt:

Possession: personal possession, constructive possession (knowledge plus control of property kept elsewhere), or joint possession with others. Property in a shared home or car is not automatically in everyone's possession.
The property was obtained by crime: usually theft or fraud, proven through the original owner or investigative records.
Knowledge: the accused knew the property was obtained by crime. Actual knowledge is required, but the law treats wilful blindness, deliberately declining to ask the obvious question, as its equivalent. Mere suspicion or negligence is not enough.

The Crown often relies on the doctrine of recent possession: where a person is found in unexplained possession of recently stolen property, a court may infer theft or guilty knowledge. The inference is permissive, not automatic, and a plausible innocent explanation, such as an ordinary marketplace purchase, defeats it. Charges frequently accompany related counts such as credit card possession when wallets or cards are among the recovered property.

Penalties for possessing stolen property in Ontario

The penalties mirror theft. Where the value exceeds $5,000, the maximum is 10 years in prison where the Crown proceeds by indictment, and the Crown can also elect to proceed summarily. Where the value is $5,000 or less, the offence is hybrid with a maximum of 2 years by indictment or 2 years less a day on summary conviction. There are no mandatory minimums.

Outcomes in Ontario track the circumstances: a first-time allegation involving a single item of modest value is often diverted or resolved without a conviction, while possession of large quantities of stolen goods, or possession connected to trafficking in stolen property such as vehicles or catalytic converters, attracts jail. From July 15, 2026, possession of property obtained by crime in the context of organized retail theft is a statutory aggravating factor at sentencing. Restitution and return of property matter to resolution.

Possible defences to a possession of stolen property charge

Depending on the evidence, defences may include:

No knowledge: the accused bought or received the property innocently, at a plausible price, through an ordinary channel such as an online marketplace, with nothing that would put an honest person on notice.
No wilful blindness: suspicion alone is not knowledge; the Crown must show the accused deliberately shut their eyes to the truth.
No possession: property found in shared spaces, vehicles, or storage without proof of the accused's knowledge and control.
Proof the property was stolen: gaps in continuity, serial number identification, and ownership evidence.
Value disputes affecting the over and under $5,000 line.
Charter issues: many of these cases begin with searches of homes, cars, and phones, and unreasonable searches can lead to exclusion of the evidence.

Frequently asked questions

I bought something online that turned out to be stolen. Am I guilty?

Not if you did not know and were not wilfully blind. An honest purchase at a plausible price through an ordinary channel is a defence, and the circumstances of the purchase are the battleground.

What does the Crown have to prove?

Possession, that the property was obtained by crime, and that you knew it. Knowledge is usually the contested element, and it must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

What is the doctrine of recent possession?

A permissive inference: unexplained possession of recently stolen property can support a finding of theft or guilty knowledge. A plausible explanation for how you came to have the property answers it.

What is wilful blindness?

Deliberately avoiding confirming what you strongly suspect, such as buying an obviously new item for a fraction of its value from an unknown seller and asking no questions. It is treated as the legal equivalent of knowledge, but it requires more than carelessness.

What are the penalties?

Up to 10 years where the value exceeds $5,000 and the Crown proceeds by indictment, and up to 2 years by indictment where the value is $5,000 or less. First-time, low-value matters often resolve without a conviction.

The property was in a shared apartment. Can I be convicted?

Only if the Crown proves you knew about the property and had a measure of control over it. Mere presence where stolen property is found is not possession.

Charged with possessing stolen property? Contact us

This is legal information, not legal advice. It does not create a lawyer-client relationship. For advice about your situation, contact us for a consultation.

Sewrattan Criminal Lawyers defends property offence charges across Toronto and Ontario. Contact us for a consultation: 416-583-1510 ext. 2. Related pages: Theft, Fraud, and Credit Card Possession.

Practice Areas - 12/04/2015

Fraud Charges in Toronto and Ontario

Composed by Chris Sewrattan, Certified Specialist in Criminal Law. Updated July 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. It does not create a lawyer-client relationship. For advice about your situation, contact us for a consultation.

Fraud is an offence under section 380 of the Criminal Code: obtaining money, property, or a service through deceit, falsehood, or other dishonest means. The charge comes in two sizes, fraud over $5,000 and fraud under $5,000, and the "over" version is treated as a serious offence in Ontario, with a maximum of 14 years in prison. Fraud cases are document cases: they turn on records, intent, and the often blurry line between a failed business dealing and a crime, which is where the defences usually live.

What is fraud under Canadian law?

To convict, the Crown must prove two things beyond a reasonable doubt:

A dishonest act: deceit, a falsehood, or "other fraudulent means," a category courts assess by asking whether the conduct would be seen as dishonest by ordinary, reasonable people.
Deprivation: the dishonest act caused another person to lose money or property, or put their economic interests at risk. Actual loss is not required; risk of loss is enough.

The mental element requires that the accused knowingly undertook the dishonest act and appreciated that it could deprive someone. A sincere belief that a venture would succeed does not excuse dishonest means, but an honest transaction that simply went wrong is not fraud. The value alleged sets the charge: over $5,000 is a straight indictable offence; under $5,000 is hybrid. Fraud is distinct from theft, which involves taking without consent rather than obtaining through dishonesty.

Penalties for fraud in Ontario

Fraud over $5,000: a maximum of 14 years in prison. Where the total value exceeds $1 million, the Criminal Code prescribes a mandatory minimum of 2 years.
Fraud under $5,000: a hybrid offence with a maximum of 2 years by indictment, or 2 years less a day on summary conviction.

Sentencing in Ontario weighs statutory aggravating factors, including the value involved, the number of victims, breach of trust, and the impact on victims. Large frauds and breach of trust frauds regularly attract jail. Courts also make restitution orders, and can impose orders prohibiting the offender from work involving authority over other people's money or property. At the other end, first-time allegations involving modest amounts, including many shoplifting-adjacent and employment cases, can resolve in Ontario without a criminal record, depending on the circumstances. A fraud conviction is a crime of dishonesty, which is precisely why the employment, professional licensing, travel, and immigration consequences often exceed the sentence itself.

Possible defences to a fraud charge

Depending on the evidence, defences may include:

No dishonest intent: the accused honestly believed the representations were true, believed they had a right to the funds, or lacked knowledge of the scheme. Fraud requires a guilty mind, not just a bad outcome.
Civil dispute, not crime: unpaid debts, failed ventures, and disputed contracts are the business of the civil courts unless dishonesty is proved.
Role and identity: in multi-party schemes, whether this accused knew of and participated in the dishonesty, as opposed to being a customer, employee, or conduit.
Quantification: whether the Crown can prove the value alleged, which affects both the charge and the sentence.
Charter issues: production orders, searches of devices, banking records, and statements taken in breach of the accused's rights.
Disclosure and delay: large-document prosecutions frequently raise disclosure litigation and unreasonable delay issues under section 11(b) and the Jordan framework.

Frequently asked questions

Will I go to jail for fraud?

It depends primarily on the amount, the breach of trust, and the accused's record. Large frauds and employer frauds regularly attract jail in Ontario, with a mandatory minimum of 2 years where the value exceeds $1 million. Smaller first-time matters often resolve far short of that. Outcomes depend on the evidence in each case.

If I pay the money back, will the charges be dropped?

Not automatically. Restitution helps at every stage and is sometimes part of a resolution, but repayment does not erase the offence, and the decision to withdraw a charge belongs to the Crown. Promising or arranging repayment is a step best taken with legal advice.

What is the difference between fraud over and under $5,000?

The dividing line is the value of what was obtained or put at risk. Over $5,000 is a straight indictable offence with a 14-year maximum; under $5,000 is a hybrid offence with much lower maximums and more resolution options.

What is the difference between fraud and theft?

Theft is taking property without consent. Fraud is obtaining property, money, or services through dishonesty, where the victim hands it over because of the deceit. Some conduct can support either charge, and the Crown chooses how to proceed.

Will a fraud charge affect my job or immigration status?

A fraud conviction is a crime of dishonesty, and it can have serious consequences for employment, professional licensing, and travel, and for the status of permanent residents and other non-citizens. These collateral consequences should shape how the case is resolved from the outset.

Do I need a lawyer for a fraud charge?

Fraud files are built on documents, and the viable defences usually emerge from a close review of the records and the accused's actual role and knowledge. A lawyer can also manage the restitution question, which is easy to get wrong without advice.

Charged with fraud? Contact us

This is legal information, not legal advice. It does not create a lawyer-client relationship. For advice about your situation, contact us for a consultation.

Sewrattan Criminal Lawyers defends fraud charges of every size across Toronto and Ontario. Contact us for a consultation: 416-583-1510 ext. 2. Related pages: Theft and Possessing Stolen Property.

Practice Areas - 12/04/2015

Shoplifting Charges in Toronto and Ontario

Composed by Chris Sewrattan, Certified Specialist in Criminal Law. Updated July 2026.

This is legal information, not legal advice. It does not create a lawyer-client relationship. For advice about your situation, contact us for a consultation.

Shoplifting is prosecuted as theft under $5,000, an offence under sections 322 and 334 of the Criminal Code. It is one of the most commonly laid charges in Toronto, and it is also one of the most survivable: for a first-time accused, most shoplifting matters resolve without a criminal conviction through diversion or similar outcomes. That is not automatic. It depends on how the case is handled from the first appearance, and on understanding that the store's civil demand letter and the criminal charge are two different things.

What is shoplifting under Canadian law?

There is no separate shoplifting offence; the charge is theft. The Crown must prove that the accused took store merchandise fraudulently, without colour of right, and with intent to deprive the store of it. Intent is the heart of most defences, because the act of walking out with unpaid merchandise is often not in dispute; whether it was deliberate is.

Most cases begin with a stop by store security. Loss prevention officers are private citizens, and their arrest power comes from section 494 of the Criminal Code: they can arrest a person they find committing theft and must deliver the person to police promptly. What happens during that stop, including any search, statement, or detention, can matter to the criminal case. Police then typically release the accused with paperwork requiring a court appearance and often a condition not to attend the store.

Penalties for shoplifting in Ontario

Theft under $5,000 is a hybrid offence with a maximum of 2 years in prison by indictment or 2 years less a day on summary conviction, but the maximums say little about real outcomes. In Toronto, a first-time shoplifting allegation involving modest value is commonly resolved through the Crown's diversion program, which typically involves counselling, community service, or a charitable donation in exchange for the withdrawal of the charge. Discharges and peace bonds are also common. Jail enters the picture for repeated retail theft, organized re-selling, or lengthy records. From July 15, 2026, organized retail theft is a statutory aggravating factor at sentencing; the change is aimed at coordinated and repeat operations, not at the first-time matters that flow through diversion.

Separately from the criminal case, many retailers send a civil recovery letter demanding several hundred dollars. That letter is a civil matter between you and the store: paying it does not end the criminal charge, and not paying it is not a criminal offence. Get advice before responding to one.

Possible defences to a shoplifting charge

Depending on the evidence, defences may include:

No intent to steal: absent-mindedness, distraction, a child placing items in a bag or stroller, and honest confusion are real and recognized defences, because theft requires a dishonest state of mind.
Self-checkout errors: missed scans, misread codes, and machine errors are increasingly common sources of charges where the intent to steal is genuinely absent.
Payment and authority issues: items already paid for, exchanges, and misunderstandings about store policy.
Identity and continuity: whether the video actually shows the accused, and whether the merchandise alleged matches what was recovered.
Problems with the stop: an unlawful detention or search by loss prevention or police can affect the admissibility of statements and evidence under the Charter.

Frequently asked questions

Will a shoplifting charge give me a criminal record?

Only a conviction creates a criminal record, and most first-time shoplifting matters in Toronto resolve without one, through diversion, withdrawal, a peace bond, or a discharge. The goal from day one is a resolution that protects your record.

What is diversion for shoplifting?

A program in which the Crown withdraws the charge after you complete steps such as counselling, community service, or a donation. Eligibility depends on the value involved, the circumstances, and your history.

Should I pay the civil demand letter from the store?

The letter is a civil claim separate from the criminal charge; paying it does not resolve the prosecution, and ignoring it is not a crime. Speak to a lawyer before paying or responding, because the right answer depends on your situation.

Do I have to answer questions from store security or police?

No. You are not required to explain yourself to loss prevention or to police, and anything you say can be used in the case. Provide identification when required on arrest and otherwise exercise your right to silence and to counsel.

Can the store ban me?

Yes. Stores can prohibit people from their property regardless of the criminal outcome, and your release conditions will often require you to stay away from the location while the case is ongoing.

It was an honest mistake at self-checkout. Do I still need a lawyer?

Yes. Honest mistake is a defence, but presenting it effectively, protecting your record, and navigating diversion or trial requires advice from the outset.

Charged with shoplifting? Contact us

This is legal information, not legal advice. It does not create a lawyer-client relationship. For advice about your situation, contact us for a consultation.

Sewrattan Criminal Lawyers defends shoplifting and theft charges across Toronto and Ontario. Contact us for a consultation: 416-583-1510 ext. 2. Related pages: Theft and Possessing Stolen Property.

Practice Areas - 12/04/2015